What’s the difference between role-based and named contacts?
The distinction between role-based and named email addresses affects both legal compliance and practical effectiveness.
Role-based addresses:
Examples: info@company.com, sales@company.com, support@company.com
Represent functions or departments, not individuals
Often monitored by multiple people or routed to queues
Under UK PECR, these are corporate subscriber addresses (can receive unsolicited B2B email)
Lower personalization potential
Named addresses:
Examples: jane.smith@company.com, j.smith@company.com
Identify specific individuals
Under PECR, these may be individual subscribers (require consent)
Better for personalized outreach
Data privacy regulations apply to the individual
Practical implications:
Role-based addresses may have slightly more legal flexibility in some jurisdictions
Named addresses enable personalization that drives response
Role addresses often have catch-all configurations affecting verification
Named addresses require more careful data handling under GDPR
Most cold outreach targets named contacts for effectiveness, accepting the additional compliance requirements.
Was this answer helpful?
Thanks for your feedback!