Do privacy-first filters punish marketers unfairly?
No, privacy first filters do not unfairly punish marketers. They protect users from unwanted communication and tracking. Marketers who provide genuine value and respect preferences perform well in privacy first environments.
Filters becoming stricter affects all senders equally. Those relying on tracking and aggressive tactics face more challenge; those building genuine engagement adapt successfully. The playing field is leveled, not biased.
Privacy first filtering rewards permission based, relevant communication. Marketers following best practices already should not see significant negative impact. Struggles indicate practices that needed improvement regardless.
Was this answer helpful?
Thanks for your feedback!