Why is engagement value more important than volume?
Volume metrics mislead. Engagement quality determines actual outcomes.
Why engagement value matters:
Mailbox providers judge you by recipient response, not send count
One interested prospect beats 100 ignored messages
Positive engagement builds reputation; volume without engagement damages it
Business outcomes come from relationships, not sends
Why volume misleads:
High sends with low response indicates poor targeting
Volume growth with engagement decline means reputation damage
Easier to count sends than measure relationship quality
Volume targets create incentives for bad behavior
Better metrics focus:
Positive reply rate (not total reply rate)
Reply-to-meeting conversion
Customer acquisition cost including reputation damage
Long-term relationship value
Operational implications:
Invest in better targeting, not more sending
Slow down to focus on quality
Stop campaigns that generate volume without engagement
Celebrate good conversations, not high send counts
A single successful voyage outweighs a fleet that never docks.
Was this answer helpful?
Thanks for your feedback!