What are common misinterpretations of inbox test results?
Avoid these common interpretation errors:
Seeds equal reality: Assuming seed results exactly predict real audience placement. They are directional only.
Ignoring provider breakdown: Looking only at aggregate numbers. Provider-specific analysis reveals actionable insights.
Single test conclusions: One test is a snapshot. Trends across multiple tests are more meaningful.
Tab equals failure: Treating Promotions or Updates tab placement as equivalent to spam. Tabs are still inbox.
Overreacting to minor variation: Small percentage swings may be normal variation, not real problems.
Do not mistake a single reading for the whole navigation picture.
Was this answer helpful?
Thanks for your feedback!