What’s the difference between proactive and reactive reputation management?
Proactive reputation management prevents problems before they occur. It involves continuous monitoring, adherence to best practices, and early intervention when warning signs appear.
Proactive measures include monitoring Postmaster Tools, tracking complaint rates, checking blocklists regularly, and watching engagement metrics for negative trends. When indicators suggest problems, you investigate and correct before reaching crisis.
Reactive management responds to problems after they manifest. You discover a blocklisting, see deliverability crash, or receive abuse complaints, then scramble to fix the situation.
Reactive approaches are more expensive and less effective. Damage accumulates while you diagnose and remediate. Relationships with providers suffer. Recovery takes longer than prevention would have.
The wise captain checks the weather before sailing. The reckless one notices the storm only when waves crash over the deck.
Was this answer helpful?
Thanks for your feedback!