How should senders handle gray-area data sources responsibly?
Gray area data sources include business cards collected at events, publicly available information, and data from partners with ambiguous consent transfer. Ethical handling requires careful evaluation rather than aggressive exploitation.
Apply conservative interpretation. Even if you could argue consent exists, would recipients agree? When in doubt, err toward verification rather than assumption. Re permission campaigns resolve ambiguity.
Document decisions and rationale. If questions arise later, records showing thoughtful evaluation of gray area sources demonstrate good faith even if conclusions prove imperfect.
Was this answer helpful?
Thanks for your feedback!