What’s the proper way to interpret CTOR after MPP?
Still have a question, spotted an error, or have a better explanation or a source we should cite?
Before Apple Mail Privacy Protection, click-to-open rate was a reasonably clean content quality signal. Now it's noisier, but it's not useless. You just have to know what's happening under the hood.
MPP pre-fetches tracking pixels automatically for Apple Mail users. This inflates your unique open count, which is the denominator in the CTOR formula (clicks divided by opens, times 100). If machine-opens push your apparent open count from 500 to 1,500, the same 80 real clicks now show a 5.3% CTOR instead of 16%. The content didn't change. The denominator did.
How to read CTOR in the MPP era:
- Don't trust absolute numbers. An 8% CTOR doesn't mean the same thing it did in 2020. What matters is direction and relative comparison.
- Compare campaigns to each other, not to pre-2021 baselines. If CTOR is trending up across your recent sends, that's a real signal. If you're comparing to numbers from three years ago, you're comparing apples to a different fruit.
- Segment by mail client if your ESP supports it. CTOR for non-Apple Mail readers gives you a cleaner read. That cohort doesn't have MPP inflation in the denominator.
- Watch CTR alongside CTOR. If CTR is holding steady but CTOR is dropping, that's more likely an inflation artifact than a content problem. Real engagement deterioration shows up in both.
The metric isn't broken. It's just noisier. Use it for direction, not as a precise score.
The most useful email questions, once a month
One email a month. New questions worth reading, real deliverability changes (Gmail and Outlook updates, etc.), and any tool or report that landed since the last issue. No fluff, no upsell.
Contributors
Who worked on this answer
Every name links to their profile. Every company links to their site. Real people, real accountability.
